“Your present reality is the result of your past.”
With this single statement,
most events in life can be explained.
And yet, something feels off.
Even if you understand it—what actually changes?
Suppose you are told:
“You’re experiencing this because of your karma.”
Even if that is true,
it still doesn’t answer the question:
What are you supposed to do about it?
There is another issue.
The concept of karma is almost too convenient.
- Reasons for failure
- Unfair events
- Misfortune that defies explanation
All of it can be explained—after the fact.
But seen from another angle,
this means it is impossible to verify.
There is one more critical point.
If karma were absolute,
life should be fixed.
But reality tells a different story:
- People whose trajectory suddenly shifts
- People whose circumstances improve dramatically
- People who somehow start aligning with perfect timing
Clearly,
something is changing.
So what does this imply?
Karma alone is not a sufficient explanation.
Which means the real question is not:
“Does karma exist or not?”
But rather:
“How is karma being expressed?”
And this is where a crucial concept emerges:
the idea of state—the domain that RS works with.k
コメントを残す